<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Injured Duck, a Tragic Death, and Anonymous Posters: Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copycation.com/2009/08/21/an-injured-duck-a-tragic-death-and-mindless-newsroom-social-media-strategies-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copycation.com/2009/08/21/an-injured-duck-a-tragic-death-and-mindless-newsroom-social-media-strategies-part-i/</link>
	<description>ephiphanies on media, communications and copywriting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sad Saga of Golden Beach Hotel and Why Anonymous Postings Should Disappear &#171; Copycation</title>
		<link>http://copycation.com/2009/08/21/an-injured-duck-a-tragic-death-and-mindless-newsroom-social-media-strategies-part-i/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Sad Saga of Golden Beach Hotel and Why Anonymous Postings Should Disappear &#171; Copycation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copycation.com/?p=305#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] months ago, I wrote a post, An Injured Duck, a Tragic Death and Anonymous Posters, about the absurdity of allowing nameless readers to post trashy comments on news stories. The post [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago, I wrote a post, An Injured Duck, a Tragic Death and Anonymous Posters, about the absurdity of allowing nameless readers to post trashy comments on news stories. The post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Injured Duck, a Tragic Death, and Anonymous Posters: Part II &#171; Copycation</title>
		<link>http://copycation.com/2009/08/21/an-injured-duck-a-tragic-death-and-mindless-newsroom-social-media-strategies-part-i/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Injured Duck, a Tragic Death, and Anonymous Posters: Part II &#171; Copycation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copycation.com/?p=305#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But what about other people&#8217;s publications and blogs? In my previous post, I wrote about a boy who had been killed while rescuing a duck on a rural road. In the comments [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But what about other people&#8217;s publications and blogs? In my previous post, I wrote about a boy who had been killed while rescuing a duck on a rural road. In the comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Baron</title>
		<link>http://copycation.com/2009/08/21/an-injured-duck-a-tragic-death-and-mindless-newsroom-social-media-strategies-part-i/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Baron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copycation.com/?p=305#comment-54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Justin. There&#039;s a time for the protection of anonymity, but online comment boxes may not be the best place for a branded news site to provide that cloak.  I&#039;d imagine that some editors are concerned they&#039;ll chill free speech if they cull through and only post approved responses - that may be true.  But if a publication seeks to foster comments that are &quot;fit to print&quot; and in keeping with their brand then some editorial oversight is needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Justin. There&#8217;s a time for the protection of anonymity, but online comment boxes may not be the best place for a branded news site to provide that cloak.  I&#8217;d imagine that some editors are concerned they&#8217;ll chill free speech if they cull through and only post approved responses &#8211; that may be true.  But if a publication seeks to foster comments that are &#8220;fit to print&#8221; and in keeping with their brand then some editorial oversight is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

